Legal Opinion

Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 22, 1929No. 12,078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This case and the case of Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 85 Colo. 488, 277 Pac. 469, just decided, were tried at the same time. George W. Barlow was the owner of the land, and B. F. Maggard was the tenant. Each sued for damages sustained, it is alleged, by reason of negligence on the part of The North Sterling irrigation district. The two cases are submitted to this court upon the same record and briefs. The decision in the Barlow case is controlling in this case.

The judgment is reversed.

Mr. Chiee Justice 'Whiteord, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Henrylyn Irrigation District v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960