Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1980No. 79SA361PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

This appeal raises questions concerning the ability of a defendant charged with Driving After Judgment Prohibited, section 42-2-206, C.R.S. 1973, 1 to collaterally attack traffic offense convictions which form the basis of the defendant’s habitual traffic offender status. The trial court prohibited the appellant, Russell Millard Hampton, from asserting the constitutional and statutory invalidity of such convictions. We conclude that the constitutional challenges should have been considered. Therefore, we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this case to the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. HeinzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. People v. MascarenasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Trujillo v. GoodwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Majerus v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API