Legal Opinion

People v. Mascarenas

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 31, 1981No. 81SA164PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the district attorney in a prosecution of the defendant, Rudy Mascarenas, for Driving After Judgment Prohibited, section 42-2-206(1), C.R.S.1973. The district attorney challenges a ruling of the District Court for Rio Grande County that one of the traffic offense convictions supporting an habitual traffic offender determination of the Department of Revenue, Motor vehicle Division (DMV), was obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional right to counsel. U.S. Const. Amends. VI, XIV; Colo. Const Art. II, § 16. The court concluded that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. HeinzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. People v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Raymond G. Lasky v. Hon. J. Edwin Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Watkins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. HrapskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. People v. RomeroColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API