Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Majerus v. Carter

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1984No. 84-239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

On October 18, 1983, pursuant to the Habitual Traffic Of fender Act [hereinafter the Act], the Cascade County Attorney began a civil proceeding in the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, to have Daniel Carter declared a habitual traffic offender. During the show cause hearing on December 9, 1983, Carter challenged the Act’s constitutionality and the hearing was continued. On March 2, 1984, his constitutional claims were heard and on March 7, 1984, they were denied. On March 16, 1984, the show cause hearing reconvened and an order adjudging him a habitual traffic offender was issued on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seyferth v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PyetteMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Petition of BurnhamMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Keeney v. Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Matter of Drivers License of AndersMontana Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API