Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Worsham

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 23, 2014No. 14ag/13PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, j.

Among other things, an attorney is an “officer of the legal system and a public citizen.” 1 If this is a special role in a nation that prides itself on the rule of law, then it entails a special responsibility to abide by the law. It also means that, when acting as an advocate, a lawyer must advance only arguments that are good faith interpretations of existing law or good faith efforts to change existing law. Fraudulent conduct and frivolous argument to avoid a civic obligation are antithetical to the lawyer’s role.

Respondent Michael Craig Worsham carved out a practice that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. United States v. Ronald Wesley DanielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LandeoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Attorney Grievance v. BahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API