State v. Smothers
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Per curiam
The defendant, David Smothers, was charged with and later convicted of two counts of third-degree burglary. 1 See Iowa Code §§ 713.1, 713.6A (1997). The charges were based on allegations that he burglarized a wig manufacturing business, Today’s Modern Option, and an auto parts shop, Skerik’s Auto Parts, which are located -within the same building.
On appeal, the defendant argues the businesses are located in the same occupied structure; therefore, his conduct constituted only one burglary. He asserts his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise this issue. Finding the businesses are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SchlemmeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. HildebrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State v. YawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State v. HochmuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Lankford v. AllbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State v. DeCampSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Gully v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
- CORDLE v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Aaron Lee Stinde v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.