Legal Opinion

State v. Smothers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-1234PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, David Smothers, was charged with and later convicted of two counts of third-degree burglary. 1 See Iowa Code §§ 713.1, 713.6A (1997). The charges were based on allegations that he burglarized a wig manufacturing business, Today’s Modern Option, and an auto parts shop, Skerik’s Auto Parts, which are located -within the same building.

On appeal, the defendant argues the businesses are located in the same occupied structure; therefore, his conduct constituted only one burglary. He asserts his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise this issue. Finding the businesses are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SchlemmeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. HildebrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. State v. YawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. State v. HochmuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Lankford v. AllbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. State v. DeCampSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Gully v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
  4. CORDLE v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Aaron Lee Stinde v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API