State Ex Rel. Lankford v. Allbee
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The State seeks to attach appellant Donald Allbee’s institutional allowance to satisfy All-bee’s current and delinquent child support obligations. The State served the Iowa Men’s Reformatory, where Allbee is an inmate, with a mandatory income withholding order. The district court sustained Allbee’s motion to quash the order. The State appeals. We affirm.
I.Background Facts and Proceedings.
Allbee has a court-ordered support obligation to provide for his daughter, Chastity Lankford. He became delinquent in this obligation. So in 1987, the Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Office of Consumer AdvocateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- State ex rel. Palmer v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Little v. WinbornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CroneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Tim O'Neill Chevrolet, Inc. v. ForristallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. AhitowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Olympus Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Kehm Enterprises, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.