Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lankford v. Allbee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1079PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The State seeks to attach appellant Donald Allbee’s institutional allowance to satisfy All-bee’s current and delinquent child support obligations. The State served the Iowa Men’s Reformatory, where Allbee is an inmate, with a mandatory income withholding order. The district court sustained Allbee’s motion to quash the order. The State appeals. We affirm.

I.Background Facts and Proceedings.

Allbee has a court-ordered support obligation to provide for his daughter, Chastity Lankford. He became delinquent in this obligation. So in 1987, the Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. US West Communications, Inc. v. Office of Consumer AdvocateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Palmer v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. State v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Little v. WinbornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CroneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Tim O'Neill Chevrolet, Inc. v. ForristallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. AhitowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Olympus Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Kehm Enterprises, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API