Legal Opinion

State v. DeCamp

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 2001No. 00-0101PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

The primary issue we consider in this appeal is whether prior convictions for possession of a controlled substance can be considered under the sentencing enhancement provisions of Iowa Code section 124.401(5) (1999), when the prior convictions predated the amendment providing for enhanced sentencing and were identified by a different code section. We conclude the prior convictions can be considered and affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court. We preserve an additional issue of ineffective assistance of counsel for postconviction relief proceedings.

I. Background…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. State v. EichlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Trent D. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Star Equipment, Ltd. v. State of Iowa, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Harvey v. Care Initiatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Hawkeye Land Company v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. State v. BelkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API