Legal Opinion

State v. Hochmuth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1998No. 97-1915PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Laura Hochmuth appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon her conviction of second-degree kkmapping in violation of Iowa Code section 710.3 (1997). She first argues her guilty plea is invalid because it was based upon an uncharged offense. She next argues Iowa Code section 902.12, which requires that she serve 100% of the maximum sentence without the possibility of parole or work release, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the federal and state constitutions. See U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1; Iowa Const, art. I, § 6. Hochmuth also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CeaserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. State v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. State v. ArneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. State v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Herman v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Tyler James WebsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State of Iowa v. Clifford Lynn McNealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. State v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. State v. FintelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. State v. YoreckTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API