Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2012-211870; No. 5176PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Appellate Panel) awarded Richard A. Hartzell (Claimant) medical care and treatment benefits for a back injury. Palmetto Collision, LLC, (Employer) appeals the award, arguing the Appellate Panel erred in (1) determining Employer regularly employed four or more employees and, therefore, was subject to the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (Act)1; (2) finding Claimant accidentally injured his back “on or about February 25, 2009,” and failing to make any conclusion of law thereon; (3) finding Claimant reported the injury timely…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Nero v. S.C. Dep't of Transp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API