Osteen v. Greenville County School District
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
TOAL, Justice:
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that Osteen’s injury is not compensable under the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Law. I would hold that Osteen’s injury was by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment and therefore compensable. Thus, I would affirm the Court of Appeals.
In my view, there are two basic problems with the majority’s analysis. First, I believe .the majority, in effect, incorrectly characterizes the personal comfort doctrine and certain other acts outside an employee’s regular duties as exceptions to the “arising out…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Nolan v. DaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.