Legal Opinion · Dissent

Osteen v. Greenville County School District

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 26, 1998No. 24843Published

1Dissent

TOAL, Justice:

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that Osteen’s injury is not compensable under the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Law. I would hold that Osteen’s injury was by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment and therefore compensable. Thus, I would affirm the Court of Appeals.

In my view, there are two basic problems with the majority’s analysis. First, I believe .the majority, in effect, incorrectly characterizes the personal comfort doctrine and certain other acts outside an employee’s regular duties as exceptions to the “arising out…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Nolan v. DaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API