Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1993No. Nos. 56143, 59971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree robbery and the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We remand in part and affirm in part.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence adduced at trial was the following: On March 20, 1988, Jeffrey Adams (Victim), an employee of the Campus Ministry for St. Louis University, was in the basement of the St. Francis Xavier Catholic Church preparing for the 7 p.m. liturgy. Victim was startled by a voice which demanded his money.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. HollowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API