State v. Hill

ORDER

Defendant appeals the denial of his Batson challenge to the prosecutor’s peremptory strikes after this court remanded to the trial court to determine whether said strikes were racially motivated, 854 S.W.2d 486. We affirm. The trial court’s denial of Defendant’s Batson motion is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The denial of Defendant’s Batson motion is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the…