State v. Holloway
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
This court has consolidated Defendant’s appeal from his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and his appeal from the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
Only a brief description of the facts is necessary, because Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him. On March 17, 1992, Detective Vincent Carr was working undercover for the St. Louis City Police Department in the narcotics division. He was a member of the Street Corner Apprehension Team (SCAT), which infiltrates narcotics operations in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. BeishlineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- J.L.T. v. Greene County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lebbing v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State of Missouri v. Ramon D. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019