Legal Opinion
Maryland National Bank v. Traenkle
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 5, 1996No. Civil No. K-90-2731PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Maryland National Bank (“the Bank”) brought the within action against defendants Robert H. Traenkle and Christine D. Traenkle (“the Traenkles”) to collect a debt allegedly owed to the Bank. Defendants filed a counterclaim and an amended counterclaim. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment as to both its case in chief and the amended counterclaim. This Court will grant plaintiffs motion as to the case in chief and deny that motion as to the counterclaims, except insofar as the counterclaims are precluded, as discussed infra.
I
Facts
The following…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- The MARY, Stafford, MastfSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Lampros v. Gelb & Gelb, P.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Maryland National Bank v. TraenkleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Lasalle National Leasing Corp. v. Lyndecon, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Joe M. Baragas and Randall McLerran v. Coupland State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.