Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Rose

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7523SC432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A number of caveator’s assignments of error arise out of of the following. Other than those who saw decedent in the law office on the day the purported will was executed, most of propounder’s witnesses could not say that they had seen or talked with decedent within a month of the time the will was executed. In substance, the following question was asked of each of them:

“ . . . based on your conversations with him, and observations I ask you if you have an opinion, satisfactory to yourself, as to whether James Rose possessed on March 19, 1974-, sufficient mental capacity to know…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Will of ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitman Ex Rel. Wilson v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Matter of Will of WomackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In re the Will of CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Matter of Will of WadsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API