Matter of Will of Womack
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The issues to be determined on this appeal are whether the caveators presented sufficient evidence of lack of testamentary capacity and of undue influence exerted by the Boswells to withstand the propounders’ motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The law in North Carolina presumes that every person has sufficient mental capacity to make a valid will. In re Will of Franks, 231 N.C. 252, 56 S.E. 2d 668 (1949); 1 N. Wiggins, Wills and Administration of Estates in N.C. § 53 (1964). Those persons contesting the will, therefore, have the burden of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- In Re the Purported Will of AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re Will of MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- In Re Will of TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- In re Will of TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Will of MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Matter of Estate of ForrestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Dyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Matter of Estate of ForrestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984