Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Shute

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 451PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Propounder assigned as error the following portion of the judge’s charge to jury:

“Now, members of the jury, the Court instructs you that if the propounders have satisfied you by the greater weight of the evidence, the burden being upon the propounders to so satisfy you that at the time the paper writings were torn there at the hospital, in the presence of Rowena M. Shute and Mr. Day, that she didn’t have sufficient mental capacity to revoke her will, that is that she didn’t possess mind sufficient to understand without prompting what she was engaged in, and the kind and extent of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. In Re Will of RawlingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. In re Will of TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. In Re the Will of YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McGill v. FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. In Re the Will of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Matter of Will of BuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Matter of Will of ColeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Wrenn v. HolyfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API