Legal Opinion
Base One Technologies, Inc. v. Ali
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 20, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1520PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
One reason that companies insert non-compete provisions in their employment contracts is to prevent their workers from stealing their clients. That, claims Plaintiff Base One Technologies, is precisely what happened here.
Base One is an information-technology support firm that provides recruiting and staffing services to its clientele. Several years ago, it hired Defendants Mohammed Ali and Hossein Beyzavi and designated them to provide IT assistance to International Business Machines Corporation, one of Base One’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Thorp v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kemp v. EilandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Johnson v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lewis v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.