Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Perrine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1923No. 2098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by Nat S. Perrine against M. O. Barnett. Plaintiff alleged that he contracted, by separate contracts for each car, to buy from the defendant four cars of wheat at fixed prices per bushel, on basis of a stated price on red or hard winter wheat No. 1, with stated deductions for lower grades, to be delivered at Texas common points, destination weights and grades to govern. That-three cars of wheat were shipped on these contracts and plaintiff paid drafts drawn on him by defendant attached to bills of lading covering the shipments. That on the basis of the destination…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pulsifer v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. McKnight v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Walker v. Hirsch Cooperage Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Hitchcock v. Griffin & Skelley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API