McKnight v. . Devlin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff became the owner of the notes in suit, with full notice of the defence now set up, and of the equities of the defendant, and is not, therefore, entitled to the protection accorded to bona fide holders of negotiable paper. The notes were subject to the same defences in his hands that they would have been in the hands of the original payee. (Skilding v.Warren, 15 J.R., 270; Kasson v. Smith, 8 Wend., 437; Story on Prom. Notes, §§ 190, 197.)
The notes were given for personal property; and, in the absence of an express warranty of title, the law would imply such warranty. Every vendor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Muller v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Kerr v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Dunckel v. . WilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McKecknie v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Thoreson v. Minneapolis Harvester WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Holden v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Oswalt v. CronkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- MECHANICAL DEVICES CO., INC. v. General Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.