Legal Opinion
Walling v. Comet Carriers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
I
The defendant moves for an order directing the plaintiff “to produce and permit the inspection and copying” of documents. These consist of affidavits, statements and transcripts of interviews and interrogatories by employees of the defendant. As I understand, and shall assume, all those papers are in the possession or under the immediate control of the plaintiff. He received one set of the papers preceding and another set subsequent to the commencement of the action.
The motion is made pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ex Parte SackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Fleming v. BernardiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. HolodDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. CoggeshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Bank Line v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.