Legal Opinion

State Retirement & Pension System v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 4, 2002No. 74, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, through a writ of mandamus, effectively enjoined the State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland (SRPS) from complying with a statutory mandate to reduce disability retirement benefits payable to respondent, Patrick Thompson, by amounts equivalent to workers’ compensation benefits that Thompson is receiving by reason of the same work-related disability that served as the basis for his retirement. Two issues are presented here: (1) whether the court should have dismissed Thompson’s complaint for failure to exhaust an available administrative…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Aravanis v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Polomski v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. County Council v. BillingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Carven v. State Retirement & Pension SystemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Freedom ExpressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Chestnut Real Estate Partnership v. HuberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API