State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Freedom Express
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
The issue in this case concerns the scope of a trial court’s authority in an action by the Maryland Commission on Human Relations to enforce an administrative subpoena pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1998 RepLVol.), Art. 49B, § 11(d).
I
Prior to May 27, 1997, Mrs. Marvinette Karasek was employed by the defendant-appellee, Freedom Express/Dome-gold, Inc., the operator of a pharmacy, as a “pharmacist technician.” On June 6, 1997, Mrs. Karasek filed with the Commission on Human Relations a complaint against the defendant, asserting discrimination because of her gender and because…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ferdinand-Davenport v. Children's GuildDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Sprenger v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Halici v. City of GaithersburgCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.