Legal Opinion

State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Freedom Express

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 2003No. 33, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The issue in this case concerns the scope of a trial court’s authority in an action by the Maryland Commission on Human Relations to enforce an administrative subpoena pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1998 RepLVol.), Art. 49B, § 11(d).

I

Prior to May 27, 1997, Mrs. Marvinette Karasek was employed by the defendant-appellee, Freedom Express/Dome-gold, Inc., the operator of a pharmacy, as a “pharmacist technician.” On June 6, 1997, Mrs. Karasek filed with the Commission on Human Relations a complaint against the defendant, asserting discrimination because of her gender and because…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ferdinand-Davenport v. Children's GuildDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Sprenger v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Halici v. City of GaithersburgCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API