Legal Opinion
Ideal Plumbing & Heating Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 24, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
The trial court rendered judgment in this action for the plaintiff to recover from the defendant, a common carrier, for damage done to four large reinforced concrete pipes which had been shipped from Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, consigned to the plaintiff at Norwich, Connecticut. From the judgment the defendant has appealed. The only question raised on the appeal is whether the court erred in concluding that the pipes were injured in transit.
The following subordinate facts as found by the court are not in dispute. The plaintiff bought six reinforced concrete pipes, each sixteen feet long and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mears v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Cassone v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Northwestern Fruit Exch.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lincoln Farm Products Corp. v. Central RRNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Penfield Manufacturing Co. v. ChristoniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Kluver v. Midwestern Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Parrott Chemical Co. v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1968