Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1952No. 35,708PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action by plaintiff, Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a corporation, as assignee of Supak & Sons Manufacturing Company against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a corporation, and Railway Express Agency, Inc., a corporation, to recover the sum of $132.96, which plaintiff, as insurer, was required to pay to its insured, Supak & Sons, as the reasonable value of merchandise belonging to said insured and lost in shipment by defendant carriers. Supak & Sons assigned to plaintiff its claim against defendant carriers, and it forms the basis of the present…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Smith v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Swiney v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Fockens v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Rhinetubes, Inc. v. Norddeutscher LloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Badhwar v. Colorado Fuel and Iron CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Silver Lining, Inc. v. SheinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc. v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API