Legal Opinion
Cassone v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 8, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The plaintiff alleges, as reasons of appeal, the refusal of the trial court to amend its finding as requested in his motion to correct and add to the finding. In so far as the motion requested changes in the wording of the finding as made, an examination of the record shows that there is no basis for such changes; in so far as the motion seeks to have additional matter inserted in the finding, it is matter properly omitted or not material to the sufficient presentation of the claims of law made by the plaintiff.
This is an action to recover damages for the alleged failure of the defendant to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. McGinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Coupland v. Housatonic R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ItuleArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- W. H. Blodget Co. v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Shapiro v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- W. E. Roche Fruit Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.