Legal Opinion

Gahagan Const. Corporation v. Armao

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 6, 1948No. 4280PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.

■ This is an action at law under the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688. The plaintiff alleges that on November 11, 1945, while he was employed by the defendant as a deck hand and member of the crew of a dredge operated by the defendant on navigable waters of the United States in Boston Harbor, he sustained severe injuries because of the defendant’s negligence.

At the time of the accident the defendant, the Gahagan Construction Corporation, was engaged in dredging operations for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The defendant was to dredge material from…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. McKie v. Diamond Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Anna Mahramas v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., and House of Albert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Summerlin v. Massman Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API