Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Durden

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 14, 1982No. ACM 23371PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

In this case1 we analyze several matters relating to production of materials under the Jencks Act.2 Finding no violation of the Act, we affirm the accused’s conviction.

Agent Jones of the Office of Special Investigations (OSI) was assigned as an undercover operator in a drug investigation at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. His local contact was Special Agent (SA) Watson, the OSI Detachment Commander.

During the undercover operation, Agent Jones wrote down memory jogging information such as names, dates, and addresses. *508According to Jones’ testimony, he included all this information on…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, Gordon Rae Childress, Sammy Brice Brock, Roger Lee Bard, Russell Richard CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. CuestaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GomezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. BarberU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. DouglasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. HamiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API