Legal Opinion

United States v. Barber

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 17, 1985No. ACM 24718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

This appeal concerns the Jencks Act,1 which provides that after a witness has testified the government must produce any statement of the witness in the possession of the government which “relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified.” Rather than follow the statute, the trial defense counsel, through a motion in limine, sought to suppress the testimony of a key government witness, contending that numerous statements by this individual relating to his own drug misconduct had been lost or destroyed by the government and therefore were not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. BlascoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Starusko, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DouglasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. HamiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. HolmesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. StaleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API