Legal Opinion
Krempl v. Unigard Security Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 19, 1993No. 30019-9-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pekelis, A.C.J.
Plaintiff Stephen Krempl appeals the trial court's order of summary judgment in this insurance coverage dispute. Krempl, the policyholder's assignee, contends that as a matter of law the homeowners insurance policy issued by Unigard Security Insurance Company (Unigard) provided coverage for his injuries. We disagree and affirm.
The facts are undisputed. In May of 1988, Stephen Krempl accompanied Kirk Wilson and his father, Sidney Wilson, to pick up a 1955 Buick that Sidney had purchased for his son's use. Because the fuel pump-was broken, Sidney jerry-built a temporary fuel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Best Food v. Alea LondonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- American Best Food, Inc. v. Alea London, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
- Wright v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Australia Unlimited, Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.