Legal Opinion
Poer v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 27, 2010No. 09-3473PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Darrell Poer brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., against his employer, the Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Administration”). He alleged that the Administration failed to promote him because he had engaged in protected activity, specifically he had testified on behalf of two other employees. The district court granted summary judgment to the Administration. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts 1
1
Mr. Poer’s claim concerns the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Alfred L. Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Gates v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Cheryl Weaver v. Speedway, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Weber v. Universities Research Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Redd v. NolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Thompson v. Memorial Hosp. of CarbondaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.