Legal Opinion
Powell v. LOCKHART III
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 29, 2009No. Civil Action 04-0423 (RMU), 07-1693(RMU)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims that during her tenure of employment with the defendant, her supervisor discriminated against her on the basis of her gender, retaliated against her for participating in protected activity and created a hostile work environment based on gender discrimination and retaliation.
The court concludes that the plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence on…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Manuel v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Booth v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Simms v. Center for Correctional Health & Policy StudiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hernandez v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.