Legal Opinion

David C. Hepple v. Roberts & Dybdahl, Inc., Restated Employee Profit-Sharing Plan

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1980No. 79-2052PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

David C. Hepple brought this action to recover benefits allegedly due under his former employer’s Employee Profit Sharing Plan and Trust. The company had denied Hepple any benefits because of his violation of a non-competition clause contained in the Plan. On cross-motions for summary judgment the District Court (the Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa) held that the clause did not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C § 1001 et seq., and granted summary judgment for defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert S. Fremont and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company, Robert S. Fremont, Ronald L. McCarthy and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. Winer v. Edison Bros. Stores Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Nedrow v. MacFarlane & Hays Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan & TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. America Hernandez v. Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Noell v. American Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API