Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, C. J.:
This action was commenced by the appellant, Alliance Mutual Casualty Company (Alliance), for declaratory *770judgment to determine the rights and liabilities of various parties by reason of insurance policies issued. At issue is the question of coverage under the “omnibus clause” of a family automobile insurance policy issued by Alliance to Jack W. Seamens, which was in full force and effect on December 4, 1967. The policy was on a 1960 Lincoln Continental four-door automobile which was titled in the name of Jack W. Seamens and provided…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. WillisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HokansonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Gangel v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Jones v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- McClintock v. McCallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.