Legal Opinion

Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1972No. 46,783PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, C. J.:

This action was commenced by the appellant, Alliance Mutual Casualty Company (Alliance), for declaratory *770judgment to determine the rights and liabilities of various parties by reason of insurance policies issued. At issue is the question of coverage under the “omnibus clause” of a family automobile insurance policy issued by Alliance to Jack W. Seamens, which was in full force and effect on December 4, 1967. The policy was on a 1960 Lincoln Continental four-door automobile which was titled in the name of Jack W. Seamens and provided…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. WillisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HokansonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  2. Gangel v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Jones v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  5. McClintock v. McCallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API