Legal Opinion

Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 20, 1970PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Proctor, J.

This case concerns the question of coverage under the omnibus clause of an automobile liability insurance policy. The policy was issued by the defendant, Hart ford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) to Mrs. Kathryn Zylka, and covered her automobile which was involved in a collision on July 7, 1964. The omnibus clause was of standard form and provided in pertinent part that coverage under the policy was extended to the named insured, her spouse, and “any person while using the automobile * * * provided the actual use of the automobile is…

2Cited by79 opinions

  1. Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. American Country Insurance v. WilcoxonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Morales v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API