John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
DonloN, Judge:
These three cases were consolidated for trial at Detroit. Plaintiff gave oral notice of intention to amend its protest claims, but the record shows that the court did not then act because defendant requested that the amendment be submitted in writing. The appropriate motions to amend were thereafter filed, and the amendment ordered.
On the claims made, as amended, the cases were resubmitted for decision on the record adduced on trial.
The merchandise at bar consists of sunflower seeds which were imported from Canada at various dates during the year 1962. It was stipulated by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- George Beurhaus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Song Kee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.