Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 26, 2012No. CV 09-649-TUC-FRZPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FRANK R. ZAPATA, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment whereby Plaintiff urges the Court to apply offensive nonmutual issue preclusion (also known as collateral estoppel) to prevent Defendants’ from disputing liability in this case. Plaintiffs motion is denied.

Background

Plaintiff’s Allegations

This ease is a putative class action on behalf of Arizona consumers who were defrauded by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Reynolds American Incorporated (hereinafter, collectively referred to as “RJR” or “Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that RJR…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorato v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  2. Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Bifolck v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Humphries v. ButtonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  5. Lewis v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API