Seattle Lumber Co. v. Sweeney
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 23, 1903, dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The lower court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals.
The facts alleged in the complaint are, substantially, that on March 1, 1902, the defendants Sweeney and wife entered into a contract with George Harwich for the construction of five dwelling houses upon five lots in the city of *693Seattle; that by said contract Barwick and one P. J. Donohue, the architect, were made agents of Sweeney and wife for the construction of these buildings; that the said lots are contiguous to each other, and that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Warren v. QuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Young v. BorzoneWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Collins v. SnokeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lumberman's of Washington, Inc. v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- McMullen & Co. v. CroftWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. LevesqueWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Stoltze v. HurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Hoagland v. MagarrellWashington Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.