Legal Opinion

Warren v. Quade

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1892No. 352PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

—This action was brought to foreclose a lien for work done and materials furnished in the erectionof a certain store building owned by defendant Otto Quade, and *751situated on certain lots in the city of Tacoma. The work was done and the materials furnished under a contract made with the firm of Moore & Company, which was alleged in the complaint to be the contractor for the erection of the building. Numerous questions are presented by the record and have been argued by counsel, but the view which we take makes it unnecessary that we should…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Curtis v. SestanovichOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Collins v. SnokeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Heald v. HodderWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API