Hoagland v. Magarrell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered April 12, 1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
This was an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The statement of facts is so incomplete that we have found difficulty in being certain as to what the facts are. They appear to he as follows: The defendants W. E. Magarrell'and wife were the owners of lots 1 to 12, both inclusive, of block 4, Hidden Addition to the city of Vancouver, Washington. They had already erected dwellings on lots 7, 8, 9,10 and 11, and intended to erect dwellings on the remainder of the lots. They seem to have made a contract with the plaintiff Hoagland to do certain inside finishing work on all of the houses, at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Seattle Lumber Co. v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Golden Belt Lumber Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933