McMullen & Co. v. Croft
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered Septembér 22, 1915, upon findings in favor of lien claimants, in an action to foreclose the lien, tried to the court.
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
Mount, J.
— This case was originally heard and decided in Department Two. After the departmental opinion was filed, which may be found in 92 Wash. 411,159 Pac. 375, a petition for a rehearing was granted, and the case was heard by the whole court. The facts are stated in the departmental opinion, and need not be restated here.
The principal question, as stated in that opinion, is this: Where the title to real estate is registered under the Torrens act, must a lien claimant register his lien under that system within ninety days ? It is conceded that the respondents, who are lien…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Malfa v. CrispWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Brace v. Superior Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stetson & Post Lumber Co. v. W. & J. Sloane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Seattle Lumber Co. v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hacken v. IsenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Lumberman's of Washington, Inc. v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Bjornberg v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.