Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin Luther Mills, III
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2002No. 99-10336PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Martin Luther Mills III appeals his conviction for manufacturing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to dismiss based on pre-accusatory delay, his motion for a new trial based on a juror’s introduction of extrinsic evidence into jury deliberations, and his motion to suppress evidence found in his backpack. He also contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional and that the court violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights when it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kerns v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Rex K. Degeorge, AKA Rex Karageorge Degeorge, Rex Karageorgiou Degeorge, Angelos George Karageorgiou, Angelos George KarageorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Letantia Bussell, United States of America v. Letantia BussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PrimeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.