Legal Opinion

United States v. Prime

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2004No. 02-30375PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court order vacating the judgment and remanding this case back to this Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the Opinion filed April 16, 2004, slip op. 4979, and appearing at 363 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir.2004), is amended as follows:

On page 1038 of the Opinion, delete AFFIRMED and in its place insert the following terminal paragraphs:

Because the defendant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and because we cannot reliably…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Martel v. ClairSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Lisa Stilwell v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Mendez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API