Legal Opinion

Traynor v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The Workmen’s Compensation Law distinguishes between an employee who is engaged in an occupation “ upon the premises or at the plant ” of his employer, and an employee who labors “ away from the plant of his employer,” “ in the course of his employment.” (§ 3, subd. 4.) An employee of the former class, who, while journeying to or from the plant or premises to which his work is localized, is accidentally injured upon a public street, is not within the coverage of the law, because not then in the course of his employment. (Matter of McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna R. R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Claim of Manor v. PenningtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Avila v. Pleasuretime Soda, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Grotsky v. Charles Grotsky, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API