Legal Opinion

Grotsky v. Charles Grotsky, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 25, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether or not the mishap which befell the deceased employe arose out of and in the course of his employment was a mixed question of law and fact. The evidence presented an issue of fact; and the Supreme Court, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Case, resolved the question in the negative. It was found “as a fact that the decedent was at the time of the accident on his way home and that he was not in the act of going to his brother’s house either to deliver the store keys or for any other purpose.” And it is fundamental in our appellate procedure that findings of fact on conflicting evidence, or on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Traynor v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Szczesny v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Jensen v. Manning & Brown, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ryan v. St. Vincent De Paul Roman Catholic ChurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Page v. FEDERATED METALS DIV., AMER. SMELT. & REF., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API