Legal Opinion
Maki v. Allstate Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 20, 2018No. 17–cv–01219–WWEPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARREN W. EGINTON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In February of 2016, Marc and Suzanne Maki noticed a series of cracks throughout the basement walls of their home in South Windsor, Connecticut. Plaintiffs attribute their failing foundation to tainted concrete, likely obtained from the J.J. Mottes Concrete Company. A chemical compound in the Mottes concrete will eventually cause plaintiffs' home to cave in on itself, and there is no known method of preventing the continuing deterioration. Thousands of similarly situated Connecticut residents are facing the prospect of crumbling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Karas v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Doheny West Homeowners' Ass'n v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iannucci v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Bryant v. General Casualty Company of WisconsinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Moura v. Harleysville Preferred Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Oliveira v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Stewart v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020