Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Reed

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1895No. 5383PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Adams county. Heard below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action of foreclosure wherein, after the mortgaged property had been sold, application was made for a deficiency judgment against the appellants. Sucha judgment was rendered and the appellants contend it was erroneous. So far as the allegations of the petition affect the personal liability of appellants, they are to the effect that the appellants bought from Higinbotham and Dutton the mortgaged premises. A written contract was entered *259into by appellants reciting that the land had been bought for the use and benefit of all the appellants, their several interests being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Reynolds v. DietzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hall v. BradburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  4. Trustees of Schools v. RautenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Reeves v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BextenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Miller v. CavettNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Perry v. RitzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Northup v. BathrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API