Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Wilcox

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage and to recover a deficiency judgment against the defendants Curtis and McCargar. The testimony tends to show that Frank D. Eeeves in his lifetime, jointly with one Fred A. Hovey, owned lots 17, 18, and 19, in Woolworth’s addition to Lincoln, and defendant Wilcox was their agent for the sale of said lots; that Wilcox, while acting as such agent, went to appellees Curtis and McCargar and represented that he could make some money on the lots in question if he could raise the cash payment, $750. The property was exhibited and price stated,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. DietzNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. DietzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Farrell v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Thornton v. Farmers & Merchants National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Comstock v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Plum v. SiekmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API