Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.
In this automobile negligence action, plaintiff seeks to recover first-party no-fault personal protection insurance (FIE) benefits.1 The trial court *344determined that the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., precluded Benjamin Strother’s recovery of PIP benefits and granted defendant summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). Plaintiff appeals as of right, and we affirm.
The facts of this case are largely úncontested. Strother was injured while driving a car solely owned by Heidi Allen and insured by defendant. Both Strother and Allen concede that Strother did not have Allen’s permission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Priesman v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Butterworth Hospital v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mester v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- McKelvie v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Amerisure Insurance v. PlumbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Roberts v. TITAN INS. CO.(ON RECON.)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Lewis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Roberts v. Titan InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.